I found a YouTube video of a green roof being set on fire that I planned to post today. You know another topic would have to be very important to pre-empt a green roof fire video.
Such a topic has revealed itself.
On Wednesday, we started talking about the New York Times LEED energy performance article. Many who understand the LEED rating system know that there has been some problems with LEED buildings not performing as anticipated in terms of energy consumption. What interests me most is what the USGBC plans to do to resolve these problems going forward. Scot Horst, USGBC senior vice president, revealed some important plans in the article:
Mr. Horst, the LEED executive, said that LEED may eventually move toward the E.P.A.’s Energy Star model, which attests to energy efficiency only for the year the label was given, similar to restaurant ratings.
“Ultimately, where we want to be is, once you’re performing at a certain level, you continue to be recertified,” Mr. Horst said.
For regular readers of Green Building Law Update, the concept of re-certification may sound familiar. Here’s what I had to say on the topic back in July:
I guess it is prediction time. At the very least, the next version of LEED will require more post-construction, post-substantial completion strategies for certification.
Or the USGBC could simply merge two rating systems: LEED for New Construction with LEED for Existing Buildings Operations and Maintenance (LEED EBOM). With LEED 2009, the two rating systems are already on the same point scale. And one of the ways to comply with Minimum Project Requirements is to achieve LEED EBOM certification every two years.
I wish I had simply had the guts to say the USGBC will require LEED re-certification for future projects. Because it is going to happen.