D.C. Keeps PACE To Support Energy Efficient Homes
Do you remember Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) bonds? If you recall, in a June 2009 post, I proclaimed my undying affection for PACE bonds, which can serve as a financing mechanism to retrofit homes and buildings:
“PACE is a bond where the proceeds are lent to commercial and residential property owners to finance energy retrofits (efficiency measures and small renewable energy systems). OWNERS then repay their loans over 20 years via an annual assessment on their property tax bill. PACE bonds can be issued by municipal financing districts or finance companies and the proceeds can be used to retrofit both commercial and residential properties.”
My hope was that jurisdictions across the country would use PACE bonds to finance retrofits of homes and buildings. Turns out, PACE bonds have been proposed in my own backyard.
In December 2009, District of Columbia Mayor Adrian Fenty announced his "administration is preparing an application for a federal grant to create a $35 million revolving fund that would make loans to District homeowners and commercial property owners for energy efficiency improvements."
There are two basic steps to establish a PACE bond program. First, a state must pass enabling legislation. Second, the state must secure seed money for the revolving fund that will finance the PACE bonds. The D.C. government is proceeding forward with both steps:
"[T]he Council of the District of Columbia is expected to take up legislation that would create not only an administrative mechanism for running the program, but would create a 'property assessed clean energy' (PACE) bond program, that will ensure sustainable funding for this initiative in coming years. The legislation would allow the District to issue a series of conduit bonds up to $250 million. The federal funds would initially seed the fund and future bond sales would be backed by future tax collections.
The average age of a building in the District is about 72 years old, or about 30 years older than the national average. Given the age of the city’s building stock, officials see a greater need for energy efficiency retrofits and program managers expect the property owners could collectively save about $10 million in utility costs during the program’s first three years."
As an owner of a hundred-year-old row house, I am looking forward to the opportunity to apply for a PACE bond.
What do you think of this program?
Related links:
A Green Building Breakup (GBLU)
District Seeks $35M Grant for Energy Efficiency Fund (DC)
PACEnow (PACEnow.org)
Photo: edwhitaker
The future of green building regulations usually starts in big cities. Cities like San Francisco, Washington, D.C. and New York City were some of the first to incorporate green building certification into regulations and building codes. The next frontier in green building regulations will be energy performance and New York City seems to be at the forefront. The New York Times recently reported this anecdote about future 
The Washington D.C. government has recently began incorporating Social Media 2.0 into its public outreach. 
When you heard that the Department of Energy would be providing $3.2 billion for Energy-Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants to states, what kind of programs did you have in mind?
This week, I want to tell you about new green building developments in the D.C. metropolitan area. .jpg)
On Wednesday, we looked at the best case scenario that can 
Today I am speaking once again on the D.C. Green Building Act "performance bond" issues (see slides in this post). I have a new message for this presentation because, frankly, I am not certain we are getting anywhere. If you need some background, here are all of the 
What will this LEEDigation look like? The Surety will file a lawsuit against the Architect or Contractor, blaming them for the project's failure to achieve LEED certification. The Architect will file an additional lawsuit blaming the Contractor, or vice versa. Oh, and the Architect will also file lawsuits against all of the Engineers. The Contractor will go a similar route and sue all the Subcontractors. 
General Services Administration, I am impressed. 
Last week, I had the pleasure of testifying before the D.C. Council regarding green building policies in the district. As mentioned in my post last week, the focus of my testimony was the 
I am very excited for an event taking place today: the 
I have been working with the D.C. City Council recently on revisions to the D.C. Green Building Act of 2007. In particular, I have been looking for an enforcement mechanism that can be used to ensure compliance with LEED certification requirements for commercial buildings. The problem is that the current Green Building Act requires a "performance bond" to guarantee certification. Green Building Law Update has covered the issued extensively and you can read more about it 
Here at Green Building Law Update, sometimes we wonder if we are just talking to our parents and significant other. Then we get a comment or a great email from one of our readers and we realize someone is actually paying attention. With that said, what happened this past week in the green building industry astounded and amazed Green Building Law Update. 
In continuing our week of epiphanies, here’s another one that struck us here at Green Building Law Update: should governments consider getting out of the green building certification process? 
Today we are going to take a hiatus from the discussions of green building in the current financial markets and, instead, wrap up what potentially could have been major green building litigation. On October 17, 2008, the Lerner family and the 
Today we are wrapping up our discussion of Shaw Development v. Southern Builders, one of the first examples of major green building litigation. .jpg)
Back in August
You may remember that in previous posts, GBLU warned that September was going to be a big month for green building regulations in Washington D.C. It was anticipated that the D.C. City Council would vote on new green building codes on September 16 but the codes were tabled to allow for more feedback from affected parties. But there was still significant green building regulations voted on yesterday in D.C.